Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniil Medvedev vs Francisco Cerundolo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Medvedev vs Cerundolo analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniil Medvedev vs Francisco Cerundolo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Medvedev has won 49.27% of points on his second serve, while Cerundolo has won 50.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Medvedev, in recent form, has won 53.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cerundolo has won 50.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.66% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Medvedev has saved 60.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cerundolo has saved 60.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Medvedev has won 72.97% of matches played (W/L 54/ 20), with Cerundolo winning 55.56% (W/L 35/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Medvedev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 237/ 74), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 82/ 46). Cerundolo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 243/ 106), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Medvedev has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 70.97% of matches (W/L 22/ 9), where as Cerundolo has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Medvedev has played against opponents with an average rank of 92.11 while Cerundolo has played against players with an average rank of 163.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Medvedev has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cerundolo has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Medvedev has converted 43.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cerundolo has converted 44.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Medvedev 0 - 0 Cerundolo
4
Rank
1
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
22
Rank
19
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
72% (512-204)
Career Total W/L
66% (290-150)
77% (23-7)
YTD W/L
48% (13-14)
$29,090,920
Career Prize Money
$2,879,565
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniil Medvedev | Francisco Cerundolo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 77% (23/7) | 48% (13/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (54/27) | 49% (33/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (429/366) | 50% (330/324) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 82% (18/4) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 53% (10/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 164 | 78 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 120 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:9 | 1:55:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 104.47 | 222.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1529/2501) | 67% (1452/2160) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (1111/1529) | 65% (944/1452) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (484/972) | 51% (359/708) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (112/255) | 44% (86/195) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1026/2560) | 39% (805/2043) |
| Slam W/L | 86% (6/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 74% (14/5) | 58% (7/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 36% (4/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 77% (17/22) | 48% (12/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 86% (6/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (10/12) | 25% (3/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 89% (8/9) | 45% (5/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 54% (13/7) | 20% (15/3) |
Daniil Medvedev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats 
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
4 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
32
Total Points Won
25
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Alexander Bublik
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Sebastian Korda
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
32%
(
37 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
114
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniil Medvedev
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Gael Monfils
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Daniil Medvedev
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Nicolas Jarry
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Francisco Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Matteo Gigante
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Alexander Zverev
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Fabian Marozsan
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
71%
(
91 of
128)
1st Serve %
77%
(
81 of
105)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
48%
(
61 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Federico Coria
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Daniel Altmaier
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Medvedev Vs Cerundolo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
